A friend's father is in hospital. The family needs help with treatment costs the local healthcare system does not fully cover. You and seven other friends agree to chip in — small amounts, £20-£40 each, to cover an immediate £200 need. Someone sets up a GoFundMe. The eight of you contribute. The friend's family receives approximately £190 after platform fees and payment processing.
The £10 difference is small in absolute terms. It is also the cleanest possible illustration of how group-fundraising platforms work: a transparent percentage cut on every contribution, applied even when the entire group is people who already know each other and would have given the money directly if there had been a path.
For larger amounts the percentage compounds. For amounts that should be tiny — a £5 chip-in for a friend's birthday gift — the percentage hits especially hard, because card processing's flat fees are largest as a share of small amounts. The platforms are not running unfair businesses. They are running businesses that price their services at the rates the existing payment infrastructure forces them to.
The S-handle restructures the payment infrastructure underneath group fundraising — and most of the platform-fee logic disappears with it.
What group fundraising actually costs on the existing platforms
GoFundMe. No platform fee for personal fundraisers in most countries (GoFundMe earns from optional tips). Payment processing of approximately 2.9% + 30¢ per contribution still applies. A £200 fundraiser with eight contributions of £25 loses £4-£8 to processing alone, plus any optional tips contributors choose to add to GoFundMe itself.
JustGiving. Platform fee plus processing for charity fundraisers. Personal fundraisers on JustGiving Crowdfunding carry processing fees plus an optional service contribution. UK-centric.
Tilt (closed). Was a popular pool/group-gift platform; shut down in 2017. Left a gap in the market that has not really been filled.
PayPal Pools (US). Available in some markets; basic functionality; relies on PayPal's underlying processing fees. Limited in countries where PayPal availability itself is restricted.
Mass-bank-transfer ad-hoc. Friends collect to one person's bank account via individual transfers. Works domestically; falls apart cross-border because each contributor's bank charges a fee, the recipient may incur receiving-bank fees, and the FX margin on each individual transfer compounds.
Cryptocurrency-based fundraising. Works for crypto-native groups but the contributor base for most fundraisers is not crypto-native. Setting up wallets specifically for one fundraiser is high-friction.
The pattern: every existing option carries either a percentage cut, a country restriction, a setup-friction layer, or some combination. None of them treats group fundraising as the simple "everyone in the group sends to one place" operation it really is.
How an S-handle works for group fundraising
An Shandle is a single payment identifier — short, shareable, permanent, global. For group fundraising, the handle becomes the universal pool address: one identifier, shared in the group chat or email, that any contributor sends to from any country.
The use cases:
Friend's medical fund. The family member managing the fund publishes their Shandle. Contributors from anywhere send any amount, from any currency. The fund's recipient sees each contribution arrive in seconds, with the contributor's identifier visible in the transaction record. No platform sits between contributor and recipient.
Wedding-fund pool. The couple publishes their Shandle on the wedding site or in the invitation. Guests contribute from their wallets directly — no Honeyfund 3.5%, no Zola 2.5%+Stripe, no individual gift-card workarounds.
Join the conversation.
0 comments · Be respectful, be specific, be useful.
Be the first to comment.